really proud of your efforts. Hope more people in DC have the courage to join you.
wallpaper Chicago Tribune December
it took 45 days for the cheques to be encashed for the EAD application when I sent it to the Lockbox facility. I beleive they receive the mails in one location and forward it to the appropriate center.
lol! I see what you mean
2011 Chicago Tribune newspaper.
ask to see if ur company can support the original GC application also. If they will provide you documentation that you mention in the 3rd point you should be fine.
Your company attorney's should be able to guide you more.
I think this is no different that using an EAD to switch jobs. You can continue working on H1B also - provided your company sees no need to file amended H1B .
Your company attorney's should be able to guide you more.
I think this is no different that using an EAD to switch jobs. You can continue working on H1B also - provided your company sees no need to file amended H1B .
tri state members should take advantage of this
thanks to you guys for all this effort!
thanks to you guys for all this effort!
I wondered why the top of the stamp design was rounded :) I think this would look better without the rounded edge. But the design itself is really good!
Today I got the approval for 7th year H1 extension
2010 girlfriend chicago tribune
cool ya3... who's fingerprint?
thanx alot. so i guess theres no way to position it with precision? ok....thanx 2 both of u.
hair makeup hot Chicago Tribune
Added it up :P
Yesterday I booked a visa appointment at the Mumbai consulate and no where on any of the forms did I specify that I was from Maharashtra but the appointment letter that comes out at the very end says in bold "State of Residence: Maharashtra" which is wrong.
I also canceled the appointment and re-booked it with the same outcome.
Has anybody had this happen to their case? Just trying to gauge how concerned should I get about this. Everything else on the forms looks correct but this one little thing.
Thank you in advance. Please respond with your comments.
I also canceled the appointment and re-booked it with the same outcome.
Has anybody had this happen to their case? Just trying to gauge how concerned should I get about this. Everything else on the forms looks correct but this one little thing.
Thank you in advance. Please respond with your comments.
hot McCormick Tribune Freedom
Looks nice bobdawg. Since I'm not actively updating kirupaStamps, it might be a while before I add yours up. It seems like already a long while has been up since you posted it first :P
house Chicago Tribune main editorial
Thats ok even if she doesn't have AP. That is perfectly fine. Don't worry her H4 is already stamped and she has time till next year. She is totally safe even if she does not have AP.
Thanks chantu, She doesn't have AP, Do you think it is Safe only if she has AP ?
Thanks chantu, She doesn't have AP, Do you think it is Safe only if she has AP ?
tattoo From Chicago Tribune
I took an infopass appointment last october and my FBI name check status was pending. After seeing the USCIS memo on march4th that all namecheck pending for 180 days has been cleared by feb 28th 2009, i went again for an infopass appt last week. IO toldme that my namecheck is still pending.
So i contacted my senators office same day and sent all my info along with the USCIS memo. Next day senators office called me back and told me that they called USCIS and came to know that my name check has been cleared. Senators office told me that infopass information could be wrong or may not have been updated.
IS that a possibility ? any inputs ?
So i contacted my senators office same day and sent all my info along with the USCIS memo. Next day senators office called me back and told me that they called USCIS and came to know that my name check has been cleared. Senators office told me that infopass information could be wrong or may not have been updated.
IS that a possibility ? any inputs ?
pictures Tribune Freedom Museum (2)
What I don't understand is why you are filing another I-140 when you already filed I-485? In any case you can use AC21 only after your 485 has been pending for more than 180 days.
For PD porting you need to file I 140
For PD porting you need to file I 140
dresses chicago tribune freedom center
Great job. More of the power of digital photography and post processing.
makeup Chicago Tribune redesigns its
HI
1..I would like to know if an employer revokes 140, and if the AC21 is not submitted at the time of NOID...how many days are given by USCIS?
Is it 30 days?
2..If I go to another emplyer and try to do interfile, still I need to file AC21?
And if the new category is EB2(my old application is EB3), still is that ok?
For eg..EB3 title is system analyst, and if I want to go for Eb2 then which could be more apprepriate..?Senior SYSTEM ANALYST
appreciate your response..
kp
1..I would like to know if an employer revokes 140, and if the AC21 is not submitted at the time of NOID...how many days are given by USCIS?
Is it 30 days?
2..If I go to another emplyer and try to do interfile, still I need to file AC21?
And if the new category is EB2(my old application is EB3), still is that ok?
For eg..EB3 title is system analyst, and if I want to go for Eb2 then which could be more apprepriate..?Senior SYSTEM ANALYST
appreciate your response..
kp
girlfriend chicago tribune freedom center
ooo i love the first one :thumb:
but the second one is confusing- why have a stamp with an envelope on it? oooohhh or is that the irony of it? lol looks cool still.
nice
-dale
but the second one is confusing- why have a stamp with an envelope on it? oooohhh or is that the irony of it? lol looks cool still.
nice
-dale
hairstyles chicago tribune freedom center
It will be very helpful , if any one can clarify the new rule FATCA in regards to Indian NRI bank accounts. Will FATCA filing is required for Green Card Holders also.
Thank you.
Thank you.
USCIS is one of the most greedy & inefficient organization. People in high offices should complaint about USCIS's Lie which their officials tells the congress all the time for adjudication delays. On one hand they say they are overwhelmed with too many applications, on the other hand they still issue 1 year advance parole, selectively 2 years EAD. They could easily make these documents valid for atleast 2 years, and have just one document for EAD & AP, but since they love to be overwhelmed with applications as they come the checks, they don't mind...
That is because their entire revenue comes from filing fees (2.5 billion out of the 2.6 billion dollars). Why would they make changes when they get easy money? It is a win-win for them - by both delaying the processing of the original application and by reducing the validity of the interim benefits, they prolong the money flow.
Don't expect any reform from Congress because they are the ones who allocated the filing fees revenue to pay for the USCIS expenditure.
That is because their entire revenue comes from filing fees (2.5 billion out of the 2.6 billion dollars). Why would they make changes when they get easy money? It is a win-win for them - by both delaying the processing of the original application and by reducing the validity of the interim benefits, they prolong the money flow.
Don't expect any reform from Congress because they are the ones who allocated the filing fees revenue to pay for the USCIS expenditure.
An investment of $500,000 may be sufficient if the investment is in a rural area or in an area of high unemployment.
