Not yet. I'm planning to. :D. Can you please eloborate "we", apart from you who else is interested in knowing?
We would like to know the count of GC waiting applicants with US citizen children.
We would like to know the count of GC waiting applicants with US citizen children.
wallpaper 18 3D Graffiti Wallpapers
Ok, so my PD got current (EB3 India). What next?
Optimystic -- is your PD current?
IF you have a current PD RIGHT NOW...AND submitted your I-485 on or before June-July 2007... AND have an approved I-140
(i) they are sweeping through all the files to find such files because if you filed your application in June-July 2007, 180 days have likely passed since your name check was submitted to the FBI. Name check request are made within weeks of generating a receipt for you.
(ii) they plan to complete this sweep by March 10; UNLESS visas run out, they plan to process such cases in approx 60 days (hah! like I believe them).
(iii) within the set of applications with current PDs, they apparently process in order of RD. Not sure if this is within the EB preference and current PD or across all EB preferences.
(iv) Some cases are approved without any changes in LUD i.e. that amazing email arrives before without any prior LUD changes.
IF you don't have a current PD, I have nothing to say except best of luck to all of us...the situation is pretty grim. The movement of EB-3 ROW will mop up most of the green cards left this year.
Optimystic -- is your PD current?
IF you have a current PD RIGHT NOW...AND submitted your I-485 on or before June-July 2007... AND have an approved I-140
(i) they are sweeping through all the files to find such files because if you filed your application in June-July 2007, 180 days have likely passed since your name check was submitted to the FBI. Name check request are made within weeks of generating a receipt for you.
(ii) they plan to complete this sweep by March 10; UNLESS visas run out, they plan to process such cases in approx 60 days (hah! like I believe them).
(iii) within the set of applications with current PDs, they apparently process in order of RD. Not sure if this is within the EB preference and current PD or across all EB preferences.
(iv) Some cases are approved without any changes in LUD i.e. that amazing email arrives before without any prior LUD changes.
IF you don't have a current PD, I have nothing to say except best of luck to all of us...the situation is pretty grim. The movement of EB-3 ROW will mop up most of the green cards left this year.
Thank you Hermione (Granger?)
What about salary requirements? would it be okay if I get 20-30% lower
salary? Do I have to be getting paychecks every month?
Yeah, sticking up for the Muggle-born :)
Salary should not be drastically different, but -20-30% should not be a red flag. Can you construct a more complicated compensation agreement that would include defined compensation (salary) and your share in profits or equity of the company? On one hand, it may be a good idea overall (and will protect your friendship), on the other hand, it is a lot harder for USCIS to cause trouble if they can't clearly understand what your total compansation compared to old job would be.
What about salary requirements? would it be okay if I get 20-30% lower
salary? Do I have to be getting paychecks every month?
Yeah, sticking up for the Muggle-born :)
Salary should not be drastically different, but -20-30% should not be a red flag. Can you construct a more complicated compensation agreement that would include defined compensation (salary) and your share in profits or equity of the company? On one hand, it may be a good idea overall (and will protect your friendship), on the other hand, it is a lot harder for USCIS to cause trouble if they can't clearly understand what your total compansation compared to old job would be.
2011 18 3D Graffiti Wallpapers
@kumar1: you probably are right about the Myths....
Hmmm ... I am worried now that my H1 stamping was a waste....
Let me ask you this : why did they even grant me the h1 approval i797 form? Even when they know that my 485 is pending?
Also at the Consulate they gave me a stamp, despite knowing that my GC process is ON.
All that tells me that USCIS and DOS allows this dual intent.
Any more thoughts from the Gurus?
Hmmm ... I am worried now that my H1 stamping was a waste....
Let me ask you this : why did they even grant me the h1 approval i797 form? Even when they know that my 485 is pending?
Also at the Consulate they gave me a stamp, despite knowing that my GC process is ON.
All that tells me that USCIS and DOS allows this dual intent.
Any more thoughts from the Gurus?
Webfax #15 sent.
Glad to see there is some hope in future for EB3 I.
But we shouldn't rest on these hopes. If we can get at-least couple of items on IV agenda (recapture , STEM) passed we should all be greened for sure.
Heres hoping for the best.
But we shouldn't rest on these hopes. If we can get at-least couple of items on IV agenda (recapture , STEM) passed we should all be greened for sure.
Heres hoping for the best.
Prediction is as good as the data available. From previous discussions (EB2-EB3 predictions) - it was predicted to see movement based on the data available - well, I am guessing the data was incorrect and therefore predictions can never be close to being correct.
Sincerely hope that the efforts of this community is to seek for data that is largely correct. I guess, may be IV can ask for the inclusion of advising USCIS to release the correct data frequently in the CIR draft.
Sincerely hope that the efforts of this community is to seek for data that is largely correct. I guess, may be IV can ask for the inclusion of advising USCIS to release the correct data frequently in the CIR draft.
2010 graffiti art wallpapers_22.
I do not think this is standard. I worked for a consultant company for 7 years and never saw an agreement like that!!
Yes !!!Also to me, it feels very fishy. The topic of this document is very misleading too..."Time Sheet Agreement" and they have included all the 'bonded labor' clauses in it...Thats why I have posted it here in this forum to get some feedback from experienced people who might have come across these nonsense.
Yes !!!Also to me, it feels very fishy. The topic of this document is very misleading too..."Time Sheet Agreement" and they have included all the 'bonded labor' clauses in it...Thats why I have posted it here in this forum to get some feedback from experienced people who might have come across these nonsense.
I have sent an email to US Senator Dianne Feinstein, California.
Please send an email to your Senators.
sent my email to John Cornyn of Texas
Please send an email to your Senators.
sent my email to John Cornyn of Texas
hair Graffiti - Street Art - quot;Betta
Yes its good USCIS have revenue to hire more people to process our applications. Well said.
It makes no difference whether they allow concurrent filing of 140/485 or not IF YOUR EMPLOYER IS WILLING to pay extra premium processing for 140. IF not , it makes minimal difference (2-3 months delay). Earlier this year, people were getting 140 approved on 6-8 weeks average without premium fee.
If your date is not current:
This rule makes 0 difference. File 140 and wait for approval while your date moves forward. Once its current, file 485.
If your date is current: File 140, regular processing 2-3 months and then file 485. If you can get premium processing done then it would be 15 days and then file 485. Either ways, you are delay in filing 485 by 2-3 months. In the grand scheme of things, its negligible. It would take even 2 months for your lawyer to get the paperwork straight for filing 485.
So please relax, this new rule that does not allow concurrent filing of 485 and 140 is not earth-shattering. Its a revenue generation move. And its good as long as revenue stays in USCIS as they do need revenue to hire more people to process files faster, which is in our own benefit. The only problem we have is the rise in fees generates revenue which often times does not stay with USCIS and goes away to other agencies of DHS(I think, this was mentioned in CIS Ombudsman report, if I am not wrong).
It makes no difference whether they allow concurrent filing of 140/485 or not IF YOUR EMPLOYER IS WILLING to pay extra premium processing for 140. IF not , it makes minimal difference (2-3 months delay). Earlier this year, people were getting 140 approved on 6-8 weeks average without premium fee.
If your date is not current:
This rule makes 0 difference. File 140 and wait for approval while your date moves forward. Once its current, file 485.
If your date is current: File 140, regular processing 2-3 months and then file 485. If you can get premium processing done then it would be 15 days and then file 485. Either ways, you are delay in filing 485 by 2-3 months. In the grand scheme of things, its negligible. It would take even 2 months for your lawyer to get the paperwork straight for filing 485.
So please relax, this new rule that does not allow concurrent filing of 485 and 140 is not earth-shattering. Its a revenue generation move. And its good as long as revenue stays in USCIS as they do need revenue to hire more people to process files faster, which is in our own benefit. The only problem we have is the rise in fees generates revenue which often times does not stay with USCIS and goes away to other agencies of DHS(I think, this was mentioned in CIS Ombudsman report, if I am not wrong).
SThe letter must indicate that job is permanent and full-time.
[/COLOR]
I've been thru many jobs here, and none of the offer letters mentioned that the job would be "permanent" (whatever that means). It's especially not possible to have that written on job offer letters for contract/project-based jobs. In any case, UDCIS does *not* require you to mention that on your EVL.
[/COLOR]
I've been thru many jobs here, and none of the offer letters mentioned that the job would be "permanent" (whatever that means). It's especially not possible to have that written on job offer letters for contract/project-based jobs. In any case, UDCIS does *not* require you to mention that on your EVL.
hot graffiti art backgrounds.
I agree with all the folks who have written in support of Core Team. IV Core Team is doing a great job and I hope all will support it.
house graffiti art backgrounds.
Is there any advantage choosing a local lawyer? Can some body please suggest attorney in Chicago area.
tattoo 3D Graffiti Alphabet Wallpaper
Zcool,
I applied for my H-1B extension and got an RFE asking for contracts and client letters for the requested period i.e., for the next 3 years.
I see that they asked for client letters from you ... but did they ask for the next 3 years? and if so, did you guys reply the RFE with a client for 3 years?
I have been working at the same client for the last 3 years, through a vendor. Mine is a small consulting company. The client has been extending the contract in 6 month increments and I could get a client letter for the next 6 months only.
Same is the case with the contract.
I could not file for 140/485 in july, 07.. so do not have the EAD safety net.
Please advise.
Thank you.
I applied for my H-1B extension and got an RFE asking for contracts and client letters for the requested period i.e., for the next 3 years.
I see that they asked for client letters from you ... but did they ask for the next 3 years? and if so, did you guys reply the RFE with a client for 3 years?
I have been working at the same client for the last 3 years, through a vendor. Mine is a small consulting company. The client has been extending the contract in 6 month increments and I could get a client letter for the next 6 months only.
Same is the case with the contract.
I could not file for 140/485 in july, 07.. so do not have the EAD safety net.
Please advise.
Thank you.
pictures graffiti art backgrounds.
Am I not reading his post right??
Sure - great - lets get this to work :)
Sure - great - lets get this to work :)
dresses graffiti art wallpapers.
Just a thought, You guys with back focus problems, is it also back focused when you focus manualy. It may yeald info for Nikons repair guys.
makeup graffiti art wallpaper. hip
Last year I had already filed for married filing jointly before stimulus check thing was in discussion. From what I understand once you file married filing jointly you cannot amend to married filing separately. You can amend otherwise.
Anyhow this year if I do my taxes separately I end up owing to IRS. Does anyone know where to look for info for amendment?
Thanks
Anyhow this year if I do my taxes separately I end up owing to IRS. Does anyone know where to look for info for amendment?
Thanks
girlfriend Air Gallery - Graffiti Art
Per USCIS website, its talking 11 weeks for EAD renewal at NSC.
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplay.do
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplay.do
hairstyles graffiti art wallpapers.
Well it seems the idea to get a Stimulus for 2008 for people having spouses with ITIN is nearing dead end (no action). Now the government is planning another stimulus. I think we should work on taking the necessary steps to prevent the same happening this year (being dropped out). I think we should raise awareness and write to all people including President Obama.
web site http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/
3. Some GOP members do not want any appropriations measures � including the 12,000-15,000 band-aid or a more robust SKIL Bill � attached to any appropriations bill. In other words, they want to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) and then they just want to go home. The CR effectively extends the funding for the Iraq War into the New Year and then lets the next Congress deal with it.
Am I surprised with this?
3. Some GOP members do not want any appropriations measures � including the 12,000-15,000 band-aid or a more robust SKIL Bill � attached to any appropriations bill. In other words, they want to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) and then they just want to go home. The CR effectively extends the funding for the Iraq War into the New Year and then lets the next Congress deal with it.
Am I surprised with this?
Hope it happens.
