Seems like the spill-overs happen at the end of the year which helps dates for India to advance.
Has the process changed to where the spill-over is calculated and issued every quarter? If not, this could be a possible administrative change that can be proposed by IV.
For FY2010 there are very less GC applications filed by ROW & EB1 due to bad economy. If USCIS waits till last quarter then they wont have much visa usage during previous quarters. So it makes sense for USCIS to allocate spill over numbers on a per quarter basis. We never know how it works
Has the process changed to where the spill-over is calculated and issued every quarter? If not, this could be a possible administrative change that can be proposed by IV.
For FY2010 there are very less GC applications filed by ROW & EB1 due to bad economy. If USCIS waits till last quarter then they wont have much visa usage during previous quarters. So it makes sense for USCIS to allocate spill over numbers on a per quarter basis. We never know how it works
wallpaper of neverjustin bieber ah th Justin+ieber+and+selena+gomez+dating+pics
I think you have summarized pre-adjudication quite well.
Also note that pre-adjudication is not a very recent phenomenon USCIS service centers especially NSC has been doing it since late 2005!
Also note that pre-adjudication is not a very recent phenomenon USCIS service centers especially NSC has been doing it since late 2005!
Asking for exemption from quota will cause this proposal to fail. My suggestion:
Of the 10,000 available visas per year for EB5, only about 3k to 4k are being used. How about if one buy a house and give a minimum $100,000 cash payment (not credit in US), he will get a temporary greencard from the EB5 visa pool. If after 2 years, the house is occupied and owned by the same person without problems with credit, he will get a permanent GC. This is on top of meeting the requirements of the category he is in.
Sorry for bringing EB5 in my comments.
This is just my opinion.
I hear your pessimism on the exemption from quota. The write up here is an attempt to bring the committees on both sides to the table and let them decide what they want to do with it. The solution quoted here will not be as it is if it were to be drafted by folks on the hill. In normal conditions, exemption from numerical limits is a big issue, but given the surplus of homes, 11.5 month inventory and ever growing foreclosures, rock solid mortgages EB applicants qualify for, might make such exemption possible in a situation that is referred to as once in a century thing.
20% down payment on sale price is a sign of good borrowing habits in the mortgage industry. Last time when I checked approximately 800 visas were used in EB-5 yearly. Thats a different story.
Of the 10,000 available visas per year for EB5, only about 3k to 4k are being used. How about if one buy a house and give a minimum $100,000 cash payment (not credit in US), he will get a temporary greencard from the EB5 visa pool. If after 2 years, the house is occupied and owned by the same person without problems with credit, he will get a permanent GC. This is on top of meeting the requirements of the category he is in.
Sorry for bringing EB5 in my comments.
This is just my opinion.
I hear your pessimism on the exemption from quota. The write up here is an attempt to bring the committees on both sides to the table and let them decide what they want to do with it. The solution quoted here will not be as it is if it were to be drafted by folks on the hill. In normal conditions, exemption from numerical limits is a big issue, but given the surplus of homes, 11.5 month inventory and ever growing foreclosures, rock solid mortgages EB applicants qualify for, might make such exemption possible in a situation that is referred to as once in a century thing.
20% down payment on sale price is a sign of good borrowing habits in the mortgage industry. Last time when I checked approximately 800 visas were used in EB-5 yearly. Thats a different story.
2011 images hair justin bieber dating is selena gomez and justin bieber dating.
There is difference... We didn't spend any money after June VB but everybody spent minimum $500 after July VB...
If they don't accept application then USCIS made govt = 500* 100,00= $ 5000000.
Sure!!!
Nothing will come out of it.
Whats the difference between God and USCIS?
Atleast God doesn't think that He is USCIS.
So, relax.
In the worst case scenario, we will be no better off in July than we are in June.
If they don't accept application then USCIS made govt = 500* 100,00= $ 5000000.
Sure!!!
Nothing will come out of it.
Whats the difference between God and USCIS?
Atleast God doesn't think that He is USCIS.
So, relax.
In the worst case scenario, we will be no better off in July than we are in June.
One idiot without giving him name in comments started abusing in Hindi language.
Dude when you have guts to put comments then put your name in it. So that I know who has issues with my comments to thread.
And just don't give red " just for the sake of giving it make you feel happy ".
Must be a guy who is brainwashed by his mullas and hates the world for being unfair to his peaceful religion. I will give you green.
Narendra Modi is my choice for PM too. See how much peace and prosperity he has brought in Gujarat. We need such strict administrators who work unselfishly for the good of country.
Dude when you have guts to put comments then put your name in it. So that I know who has issues with my comments to thread.
And just don't give red " just for the sake of giving it make you feel happy ".
Must be a guy who is brainwashed by his mullas and hates the world for being unfair to his peaceful religion. I will give you green.
Narendra Modi is my choice for PM too. See how much peace and prosperity he has brought in Gujarat. We need such strict administrators who work unselfishly for the good of country.
There is a lot of debate going on here, about how Canada and Australia have a better immigration system because they are points-based self-petition systems compared to employer-petition system here in US.
....
If I score 100 points out of required 50 or 60 points for Canada, its all meaningless if I am inept and cannot get a job. However, I would contribute to my own well-being and to the workforce and economy if I can find a job and an employer willing to petition, even if I score 25 points out of required 50 or 60.
You are missing a point here though...having gone through the Canadian point system myself back in the late 90s, the Canadian point system gives you added points for having current employment in your intended occupation.
When you don't have employment, you lose those points, and have to rely on other aspects of your profile to compensate for that..it is another story that their point system is lax enough to qualify most MS and PhD people even when they don't have current employment.
Ph.Ds driving cabs in Canada is the same as immigrant doctors working as nurses or lab technicians in the US.
I will disagree with you. Employer sponsored path to permenant residency is certainly not the best. Firstly, if the average time to process an application is 5-7 years, expecting a person to shackled in the same job for that long is absurd...and for that matter, that job remaining steady and available for that long is equally an absurb assumption..
There may be unemployed Ph Ds is Canada but they are no different from the thousands of underemployed H1-B immigrants in the US, not being able to make career moves because of the employer sponsored petitiions..
My .02 cents..
....
If I score 100 points out of required 50 or 60 points for Canada, its all meaningless if I am inept and cannot get a job. However, I would contribute to my own well-being and to the workforce and economy if I can find a job and an employer willing to petition, even if I score 25 points out of required 50 or 60.
You are missing a point here though...having gone through the Canadian point system myself back in the late 90s, the Canadian point system gives you added points for having current employment in your intended occupation.
When you don't have employment, you lose those points, and have to rely on other aspects of your profile to compensate for that..it is another story that their point system is lax enough to qualify most MS and PhD people even when they don't have current employment.
Ph.Ds driving cabs in Canada is the same as immigrant doctors working as nurses or lab technicians in the US.
I will disagree with you. Employer sponsored path to permenant residency is certainly not the best. Firstly, if the average time to process an application is 5-7 years, expecting a person to shackled in the same job for that long is absurd...and for that matter, that job remaining steady and available for that long is equally an absurb assumption..
There may be unemployed Ph Ds is Canada but they are no different from the thousands of underemployed H1-B immigrants in the US, not being able to make career moves because of the employer sponsored petitiions..
My .02 cents..
apt29.
Image of india : what are you talking abt.
I can tell you how corrupt indian govts are from my personal experience.
If someone dies at ur home, to get the govt doctor come and give you clearance to take the body to burial it takes thousands of rupees. Police need no less either. Else your loved one will be waiting for those ***. If you have to claim ur loved ones insurance to take care of expenses during his death, offices play u around... They just want more money!!
I see people changing faith to get free money... its not abt faith but division in our own people. We like foreign cars, foreign made netas, foreign faiths... foreign jobs... oh #!?***
With this happening to you if you are worried abt ur countries outside image... I have nothing to say...
For all who are unhappy with govt in india : why dont we start a political party of our own?
I second your thoughts...do we have the muscle and money power to take on those gundas. If no, we can not do anything. If yes, you become another group of gundas...
Image of india : what are you talking abt.
I can tell you how corrupt indian govts are from my personal experience.
If someone dies at ur home, to get the govt doctor come and give you clearance to take the body to burial it takes thousands of rupees. Police need no less either. Else your loved one will be waiting for those ***. If you have to claim ur loved ones insurance to take care of expenses during his death, offices play u around... They just want more money!!
I see people changing faith to get free money... its not abt faith but division in our own people. We like foreign cars, foreign made netas, foreign faiths... foreign jobs... oh #!?***
With this happening to you if you are worried abt ur countries outside image... I have nothing to say...
For all who are unhappy with govt in india : why dont we start a political party of our own?
I second your thoughts...do we have the muscle and money power to take on those gundas. If no, we can not do anything. If yes, you become another group of gundas...
2010 selena gomez and justin bieber
Are you from India,,if yes, think again,,,the EB3 2003 PD may not buy u much,,u may be well know trying to go for perm and 140 with current EB2...eb3 for india is a black hole,,,i hope u know what a black hole is,,,its kinda dangerous!!
Hello Samay,
First of all thank you so much for answering my questions.
In my LCA(H1B) Prevailing wage is mentioned $ 55K & in my Labor(PERM) application Prevailing wage is mentioned $ 65K.
My labor(PERM) has been approved & I-140 is in process at TSC.
My question is
This diffrence between LCA mentioned prevailing wage(i.e. $55K) & Labor(PERM) prevailing wage(i.e. $65K) going to create any problem at stage of I-140 or later in I-485??
I am getting paid as mentioned in LCA i.e. $55K.
I will greatly appreciate response.
Thanks.
Both these are separate processes and note that the I-140 is for a future job.So relax.
First of all thank you so much for answering my questions.
In my LCA(H1B) Prevailing wage is mentioned $ 55K & in my Labor(PERM) application Prevailing wage is mentioned $ 65K.
My labor(PERM) has been approved & I-140 is in process at TSC.
My question is
This diffrence between LCA mentioned prevailing wage(i.e. $55K) & Labor(PERM) prevailing wage(i.e. $65K) going to create any problem at stage of I-140 or later in I-485??
I am getting paid as mentioned in LCA i.e. $55K.
I will greatly appreciate response.
Thanks.
Both these are separate processes and note that the I-140 is for a future job.So relax.
hair makeup justin bieber and
Best case and worst case
vdlrao,
You have always brought some statistics onto this forum and many of us have felt that your numbers have some logic. I want to know what your confidence level is on those stats, may be you feel on the inside that this is theory and God only knows wht will happen. Since the processes that USCIS & DOL follow is not very clear to anyone, I am curious.
Just as you know:
Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein
vdlrao,
You have always brought some statistics onto this forum and many of us have felt that your numbers have some logic. I want to know what your confidence level is on those stats, may be you feel on the inside that this is theory and God only knows wht will happen. Since the processes that USCIS & DOL follow is not very clear to anyone, I am curious.
Just as you know:
Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein
I am analyzing for EB-2 (India). The current date for EB-2 India was Apr 1 2004 for month of June.
Retrogression started Oct 1 2005. Before Oct 1 2005, persons with PD < Oct 1 2005 (remember PERM) could have submitted I-485. Some (not all remember namecheck) of these would be ready for adj June 1st 2007. These applicants can be divided into 2 categories: those with PD <= Apr 1 2004 and those with PD > Apr 1 2004.
Applicants in first category will get GC in June and applicants in 2nd category will get GC in Jul. These applicants can exhaust 2007 quota.
USCIS is taking 3 weeks for notification of 485's submiited in June. I would be very surprised if they process a June submission in < 3 months. So chances of June applicant using GC number are low.
USCIS knew # applicants in above 2 categories: this appears trivial. If these applicants exhaust 2007 quota, USCIS knew that quota will get exhausted in Jul. The date can be of their choosing since the work involved must be pretty low.
A similar analysis can be done for any other category. Correct me if my dates are wrong.
but if USCIS knew this (that June+July can finish all the numbers for 2007) then why does the visa bulletin talk about retrogression in September timeframe for India/China? Why not August itself?
Retrogression started Oct 1 2005. Before Oct 1 2005, persons with PD < Oct 1 2005 (remember PERM) could have submitted I-485. Some (not all remember namecheck) of these would be ready for adj June 1st 2007. These applicants can be divided into 2 categories: those with PD <= Apr 1 2004 and those with PD > Apr 1 2004.
Applicants in first category will get GC in June and applicants in 2nd category will get GC in Jul. These applicants can exhaust 2007 quota.
USCIS is taking 3 weeks for notification of 485's submiited in June. I would be very surprised if they process a June submission in < 3 months. So chances of June applicant using GC number are low.
USCIS knew # applicants in above 2 categories: this appears trivial. If these applicants exhaust 2007 quota, USCIS knew that quota will get exhausted in Jul. The date can be of their choosing since the work involved must be pretty low.
A similar analysis can be done for any other category. Correct me if my dates are wrong.
but if USCIS knew this (that June+July can finish all the numbers for 2007) then why does the visa bulletin talk about retrogression in September timeframe for India/China? Why not August itself?
hot selena gomez and justin bieber dating 2011. justin bieber dating 2011,
Very nice thinking..high thinking as long as you don't want to start applying this yardstick only on Modi and end it there.If we start applying no criminal background yardstick then no politician from the current brigade will be left(assuming when you say criminal background you mean all kinds of crimes)
In other words you are sitting on 6 th floor and Indian political scenario(to that matter political scenario else where too.e.g U.S) is on ground floor.
Let's start doing our best so we can get the ground floor to meet 6th floor.
Till they two meet let's work on 'every sinner has a future,every saint has a past'
Just so you know Obama was into drugs in teens. Wouldn't it be a loss if we applied your yardstick on him ?
Although you said you are not supporting any one of them since you kind of endorsed MMS in previous posts think about this
which one is evil of the two : a guy accused of committing crime in the past but who got his act together and is giving good performance or a Intelligent guy knowing full well he wouldn't wield any power accepting to be a show piece/wrapper PM and taking billion people on a ride?
I am not defending any party or person. Everybody is equally bad. Let, all the Muslims in Gujarat may start love him, and entire Gujarat may vote for him. That does not matter. My point is that those people who run for high office should not have any criminal background, despite how much qualified or skilled they are. Assume, if you involved in small domestic violence, and if you fail in small background check you will not get GC even if you are a Nobel Prize winner. Think about PM post and its responsibilities.
In other words you are sitting on 6 th floor and Indian political scenario(to that matter political scenario else where too.e.g U.S) is on ground floor.
Let's start doing our best so we can get the ground floor to meet 6th floor.
Till they two meet let's work on 'every sinner has a future,every saint has a past'
Just so you know Obama was into drugs in teens. Wouldn't it be a loss if we applied your yardstick on him ?
Although you said you are not supporting any one of them since you kind of endorsed MMS in previous posts think about this
which one is evil of the two : a guy accused of committing crime in the past but who got his act together and is giving good performance or a Intelligent guy knowing full well he wouldn't wield any power accepting to be a show piece/wrapper PM and taking billion people on a ride?
I am not defending any party or person. Everybody is equally bad. Let, all the Muslims in Gujarat may start love him, and entire Gujarat may vote for him. That does not matter. My point is that those people who run for high office should not have any criminal background, despite how much qualified or skilled they are. Assume, if you involved in small domestic violence, and if you fail in small background check you will not get GC even if you are a Nobel Prize winner. Think about PM post and its responsibilities.
house wallpaper selena gomez and
That's is what YSR has met with, what you call final Judgment. His head, legs chopped. In our language we call Kukka Chavu.
Just a shame on you to talk like this about dead man.
Just a shame on you to talk like this about dead man.
tattoo selena gomez and justin bieber
Wow, you have a great suggestion for him, I am sure he took your suggestion and did the right thing, do you have a similar suggestion regarding immigration to Obama ?, if so you better let him know what you think, you seem very open minded about giving suggestions.
Please read all his post first and you will understand the reason for this comment.
Please read all his post first and you will understand the reason for this comment.
pictures selena gomez and justin bieber
The topic is USCIS's memo. Why are fellow IVans discussing H1 versus L1 versus outsourcing. For some reason, a few people here think that all issues are caused by either big Indian companies or small desi companies. Some believe that getting rid of the consulting business model will accelerate their PR application. Wonder what is being achieved from these "lively" debates other than feeding the other side with enough ammo to decimate all of us. I still believe that our focus is immigration reform. Macaca is right about "self inflicted wound".
Hope folks here watch this masterpiece on Youtube and learn from wild buffaloes - YouTube - Battle at Kruger (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68kM)
Nature will never cease to amaze us.
Peace!
Hope folks here watch this masterpiece on Youtube and learn from wild buffaloes - YouTube - Battle at Kruger (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68kM)
Nature will never cease to amaze us.
Peace!
dresses selena gomez and justin bieber
I mean you guys are fighting like retarded. Use your head. What you going to gain by proving your point.
No wonder so called highly skilled get treated so "highly" by USCIS.
No wonder so called highly skilled get treated so "highly" by USCIS.
makeup Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
I have more emial addresses if you want them.....
2020@abc.com
360@cnn.com
48hours@cbsnews.com
60m@cbsnews.com
aaron.brown@turner.com
aaron.zitner@latimes.com
abc.news.magazines@abc.com
abenfer@salon.com
abenitez@univision.net
abramowitz@washpost.com
abramsreport@msnbc.com
achenbachj@washpost.com
ahrensf@washpost.com
aizenmann@washpost.com
alan.miller@latimes.com
alan@alan.com
alastair@scoop.co.nz
alevin@usatoday.com
allenh@washpost.com
allenm@washpost.com
amity.shlaes@ft.com
amontgomery@salon.com
andrea.koppel@turner.com
andrew@scoop.co.nz
aradelat@gns.gannett.com
aranam@washpost.com
areiter@salon.com
argetsinger@washpost.com
armstrongs@csps.com
arshad.mohammed@reuters.com
asherm@washpost.com
astone@usatoday.com
ataylor@npr.org
atc@npr.org
axtmank@csps.com
ayork@salon.com
bakerp@washpost.com
balzd@washpost.com
barbara.serrano@latimes.com
barbashf@washpost.com
barkerk@washpost.com
barkinr@washpost.com
barrj@washpost.com
barrs@washpost.com
barry.siegel@latimes.com
bduffy@usnews.com
bersellie@washpost.com
betsy.fischer@nbc.com
beyersd@washpost.com
bill.rempel@latimes.com
bill.schneider@turner.com
billy.house@arizonarepublic.com
bjapsen@tribune.com
blumj@washpost.com
bnaylor@npr.org
bnichols@usatoday.com
bobherb@nytimes.com
boehlert@salon.com
bonesteelm@washpost.com
boustanyn@washpost.com
bpc@cbsnews.com
bredemeier@washpost.com
brelis@globe.com
brennanp@washpost.com
brian_hill@metronetworks.com
brian.williams@msnbc.com
brinkerbob@aol.com
brooksd@washpost.com
browar57@aol.com
brownw@washpost.com
bruce.morton@turner.com
bslavin@usatoday.com
bsteigerwald@tribweb.com
burns@nytimes.com
buzzflash@buzzflash.com
bwelch@usatoday.com
bwilson@npr.org
bwyman@salon.com
candy.crowley@turner.com
carlsonp@washpost.com
carol.lin@turner.com
castanedar@washpost.com
cavendishs@washpost.com
cchocano@salon.com
ccolin@salon.com
cflintoff@npr.org
cgarrett@tribune.com
chandlerc@washpost.com
chans@washpost.com
charlierose@pbs.org
cheaterry@washpost.com
chinnid@csps.com
chod@washpost.com
chris.matthews@msnbc.com
chuck.babbington@washingtonpost.com
cj@msnbc.com
claiborneb@washpost.com
clarkp@washpost.com
cochs@ap.org
cohensh@washpost.com
cohnd@washpost.com
colmes@foxnews.com
comments@foxnews.com
connectionweb@wbur.bu.edu
contact@pacifica.org
cookd@csps.com
coopermana@washpost.com
copelandl@washpost.com
corrections@npr.org
countdown@msnbc.com
crossfire@cnn.com
csimpson@tribune.com
cushman@nytimes.com
cweiser@gns.gannett.com
cwindham@npr.org
dabrahms@gns.gannett.com
dabrooks@nytimes.com
dakirk@nytimes.com
danschiedel@kozk.pbs.org
dardalan@npr.org
daryl@salon.com
daryn.kagan@turner.com
dasang@nytimes.com
dastor@editorandpublisher.com
dateline@nbc.com
davenportc@washpost.com
2020@abc.com
360@cnn.com
48hours@cbsnews.com
60m@cbsnews.com
aaron.brown@turner.com
aaron.zitner@latimes.com
abc.news.magazines@abc.com
abenfer@salon.com
abenitez@univision.net
abramowitz@washpost.com
abramsreport@msnbc.com
achenbachj@washpost.com
ahrensf@washpost.com
aizenmann@washpost.com
alan.miller@latimes.com
alan@alan.com
alastair@scoop.co.nz
alevin@usatoday.com
allenh@washpost.com
allenm@washpost.com
amity.shlaes@ft.com
amontgomery@salon.com
andrea.koppel@turner.com
andrew@scoop.co.nz
aradelat@gns.gannett.com
aranam@washpost.com
areiter@salon.com
argetsinger@washpost.com
armstrongs@csps.com
arshad.mohammed@reuters.com
asherm@washpost.com
astone@usatoday.com
ataylor@npr.org
atc@npr.org
axtmank@csps.com
ayork@salon.com
bakerp@washpost.com
balzd@washpost.com
barbara.serrano@latimes.com
barbashf@washpost.com
barkerk@washpost.com
barkinr@washpost.com
barrj@washpost.com
barrs@washpost.com
barry.siegel@latimes.com
bduffy@usnews.com
bersellie@washpost.com
betsy.fischer@nbc.com
beyersd@washpost.com
bill.rempel@latimes.com
bill.schneider@turner.com
billy.house@arizonarepublic.com
bjapsen@tribune.com
blumj@washpost.com
bnaylor@npr.org
bnichols@usatoday.com
bobherb@nytimes.com
boehlert@salon.com
bonesteelm@washpost.com
boustanyn@washpost.com
bpc@cbsnews.com
bredemeier@washpost.com
brelis@globe.com
brennanp@washpost.com
brian_hill@metronetworks.com
brian.williams@msnbc.com
brinkerbob@aol.com
brooksd@washpost.com
browar57@aol.com
brownw@washpost.com
bruce.morton@turner.com
bslavin@usatoday.com
bsteigerwald@tribweb.com
burns@nytimes.com
buzzflash@buzzflash.com
bwelch@usatoday.com
bwilson@npr.org
bwyman@salon.com
candy.crowley@turner.com
carlsonp@washpost.com
carol.lin@turner.com
castanedar@washpost.com
cavendishs@washpost.com
cchocano@salon.com
ccolin@salon.com
cflintoff@npr.org
cgarrett@tribune.com
chandlerc@washpost.com
chans@washpost.com
charlierose@pbs.org
cheaterry@washpost.com
chinnid@csps.com
chod@washpost.com
chris.matthews@msnbc.com
chuck.babbington@washingtonpost.com
cj@msnbc.com
claiborneb@washpost.com
clarkp@washpost.com
cochs@ap.org
cohensh@washpost.com
cohnd@washpost.com
colmes@foxnews.com
comments@foxnews.com
connectionweb@wbur.bu.edu
contact@pacifica.org
cookd@csps.com
coopermana@washpost.com
copelandl@washpost.com
corrections@npr.org
countdown@msnbc.com
crossfire@cnn.com
csimpson@tribune.com
cushman@nytimes.com
cweiser@gns.gannett.com
cwindham@npr.org
dabrahms@gns.gannett.com
dabrooks@nytimes.com
dakirk@nytimes.com
danschiedel@kozk.pbs.org
dardalan@npr.org
daryl@salon.com
daryn.kagan@turner.com
dasang@nytimes.com
dastor@editorandpublisher.com
dateline@nbc.com
davenportc@washpost.com
girlfriend 3-16-11 Selena Gomez Talks
GO IV GO!!
http://digg.com/politics/Rep_Lofgren_Issues_Statement_on_Updated_Visa_Bulle tin
please DIGG
Thank you
http://digg.com/politics/Rep_Lofgren_Issues_Statement_on_Updated_Visa_Bulle tin
please DIGG
Thank you
hairstyles justin bieber selena gomez
I like this news even if it is rumor. I have 3 live examples of the CTS guys that are not even eligible for H1 came on L1 (Project Manager) and applied in EB1 and all got Green Cards in 9 months. Their pay is even peanuts. Why USCIS does not check the pay stubs for these L1s?
Write to the Ombudsman. His office works on such issues, and makes recommendations on USCIS working improvements.
Write to the Ombudsman. His office works on such issues, and makes recommendations on USCIS working improvements.
Sorry she will have to wait for the your PD to get current.
Thank you, Sir/Madam.
485_spouse
Thank you, Sir/Madam.
485_spouse
I just finished sending the emails one at a time with a little customization.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pptN-jEpAiyd3snslhPjBfw
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pptN-jEpAiyd3snslhPjBfw
